ทำไมไม่ใช้วิธีวิทยาศาสตร์ตรวจสอบจารึกพ่อขุนฯ #Pointofview #วิวเอ๋ยบอกข้าเถิด - AI Dubbing & Video Translation

Why don't we use Carbon-14 to determine the age of the first stone inscription? It's not that no one considered it, but it's quite challenging to test. Carbon-14 is typically used to date organic matter, or substances composed of carbon. And even if a test were possible, what we'd ascertain is the age of the stone itself used for the inscription. So, if we were to conduct such a test, the likely response would be something along the lines of: Oh, this inscription dates back to the Third Dinosaur Era, something along those lines, rather than precisely identifying the individual who made it. As for other scientific approaches, sometimes they compare it with contemporaneous inscriptions, correct? But that's equally challenging because each inscription's preservation conditions differ. Consequently, scientists are uncertain what this particular inscription should be referenced against. What was kept in the same conditions. That's why when we argue about who really wrote the first inscription, we have to debate the content inside it. For those who enjoy content that's both fun and has informative value like this, don't forget to follow Point of View on all channels.